Coverage of the software in passing, such as being part of a how-to document, do not normally constitute significant coverage but should be evaluated. The depth of coverage in the sources should be significant and directly about the software. Visicalc) are notable even if they are no longer in widespread use or distribution.Įditors should evaluate various aspects of the coverage: the depth, duration, geographical scope, diversity and reliability of the coverage. On the other hand, software with significant historical or technical importance (e.g. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and notability cannot be assumed. Apps in closed beta testing stages need citations that show interest and development for an article prior to release. Notability of one app does not automatically mean that each of its competitors are notable as well. An app that is just another entry in a crowded field needs more persuasively significant sources, of a kind that indicate that it stands out from the crowd. Wikipedia is not a directory of all apps that can be confirmed to exist.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |